Talk:Understanding HBase column-family performance options

From Jimbojw.com

Revision as of 16:13, 28 September 2010; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→
Jump to: navigation, search

Comments on Understanding HBase column-family performance options

Leave a comment
Sorry, comments are disabled.

Contents

Drew Farris said ...

Thanks for the detailed answers Jim, this is very useful. Now I'm off to and do some playing with HBaseShell to get a good feel for it all in practice.

I hope these posts get rolled into the docs as a primer. This has definitely helped free my head from thinking about these concepts the RDBMS way.

--Drew Farris 08:00, 28 May 2008 (MST)

Jimbojw said ...

No problem Drew, glad to help!

Thanks for posing your insightful questions - without them I probably wouldn't have thought to write this article.

--Jimbojw 09:41, 28 May 2008 (MST)

Eric said ...

A winner as always. I've been messing with HBase for a few days now - and love it. This helps, thanks Jim.

--Eric 05:39, 29 May 2008 (MST)

Jimbojw said ...

Thanks Eric!

Doing what I can, for lack of a better option :)

--Jimbojw 12:29, 29 May 2008 (MST)

Josh Ma said ...

Thinks for this article.You did a good job!

--Josh Ma 03:18, 30 May 2008 (MST)

rafan said ...

Please also see the thread "compression in HBase" in hbase mailing:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-hbase-user/200807.mbox/browser

--rafan 03:27, 11 July 2008 (MST)

Jean-Daniel Cryans said ...

Regarding the IN_MEMORY attribute in HBase, it is still not implemented so no benchmarks ;) Also, along with MAX_VERSIONS, 0.2.0 will introduce a TTL.

--Jean-Daniel Cryans 06:38, 11 July 2008 (MST)

leorleor said ...

Thanks for putting this up! And where's the beef =) I'd really like to see some benchmarks. I have been researching HBase performance and found much discussion but few benchmarks.

--leorleor 12:05, 11 September 2008 (MST)